User talk:Jarandhel: Difference between revisions
(→otherkin.net: new section) |
|||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
The archive link for otherkin.net doesn't work due to robots.txt; is there an alternative archive or a way to retrieve it? It's a historically important website and it's awful that it's gone down without a proper archive. |
The archive link for otherkin.net doesn't work due to robots.txt; is there an alternative archive or a way to retrieve it? It's a historically important website and it's awful that it's gone down without a proper archive. |
||
--[[User:Visitor|Visitor]] ([[User talk:Visitor|talk]]) 23:07, 27 June 2016 (EDT) |
Revision as of 22:07, 27 June 2016
Thank you so much for the welcome. I'm looking forward to helping this place out as much as I can. It'd be nice to have a comprehensive wiki for the nonhuman communities. :3 Kai (talk) 00:40, 3 April 2012 (EST)
- Agreed. :) I'm looking forward to seeing what we can put together here, especially as members of the other nonhuman communities join us. Jarandhel (talk) 21:45, 2 April 2012 (PDT)
Re:
Thank you! Equivamp (talk) 10:34, 25 December 2012 (PST)
- You're welcome! :) I hope you don't mind, I cleaned up your userpage a little too. Same content, just used the handy user infobox template instead of doing them all individually - it makes it nicer and adds the proper header and categories. Jarandhel (talk) 10:36, 25 December 2012 (PST)
Notability question
What are the notability guidelines (if any) for articles about individuals here on AnOtherWiki? Equivamp (talk) 10:43, 25 December 2012 (PST)
- There aren't any. If anyone wants to make an article about anyone in the community, it's fair game, whether they're well known or unknown. The only guidelines with regard to articles about people are here: http://anotherwiki.org/wiki/Help:Stylebook#Articles_about_people Jarandhel (talk) 10:52, 25 December 2012 (PST)
Late response
No problem! I'm very used to editing wikis. Equivamp (talk) 22:54, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
otherkin.net
The archive link for otherkin.net doesn't work due to robots.txt; is there an alternative archive or a way to retrieve it? It's a historically important website and it's awful that it's gone down without a proper archive. --Visitor (talk) 23:07, 27 June 2016 (EDT)